files: 52

This data as json

rowid	image	timestamp	memento	first_capture	last_capture	current_status	text	mime	status	url	urlkey	digest	length	file_path
52		20070908132254	https://web.archive.org/web/20070908132254/http://www.defence.gov.au/capability/common/docs/CDAF_CRITICS_powerpoint.pps	2007-09-08	2011-06-02	404	1 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study Chris Holloway Dep. Director Capability Guidance 2 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study BRIEFING FLOW  Background  Overview of CRITICS  Desired outputs of Current Phase  Industry involvement 3 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study  CRITICS deals with the technological elements of military capability in the years out to 2030. It thus goes beyond the current DCP.  WP2000: “The primary challenge is to select and acquire expertise and capability in those technologies that offer the most advantages in gaining and maintaining the knowledge edge.” 4 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study  CRITICS goes beyond simply selecting and acquiring technologically-advanced capability.  It is a study designed to identify and prioritise gaps in the ability of the Australian industrial base to support military capabilities in the period 2015 to 2030.  It is closely engaged with the ideas of ‘self- reliance’ and ‘operational sovereignty’. 5 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study BACKGROUND – US STUDIES Defence Industry Baseline Capability Studies  A series of studies that collectively cover all US military capability.  Each capability is mapped to a required or desired future technology / support mode. 6 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study DIBCS CRITICS US to be largely independent in acquiring and supporting US military capabilities Australia seeking an appropriate level of self- reliance for priority strategic tasks Focus on technologies to invest in & where monopolies or dependence on foreign support might occur Focus on industry capability to acquire and support the future force Extensive mapping of capabilities to technologies / support / industries Greater reliance on subject matter experts and refinement over time Many US$m & many staff years of effort Very modest levels of investment 7 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study BACKGROUND – HOW DOES CRITICS FIT IN? Industry Strategies 2015 2030 CRITICS Sector Plans Def Capability Plan Defence Capability Strategy Defence 2015 Defence 2030 CDG DMO 8 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study Phase 1: workshop and scoping study Phase 2: indicative gap analysis and report Phase 3: release to industry (CDAF) for consultation Phase 4: risk mitigation – so what do we do about the gaps? This is where we need your help. Phase 5: establish ongoing review process 9 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study  ‘Operational sovereignty’ - the maintenance of an appropriate degree of sovereignty over industrial skills, capacities, capabilities and technology to ensure operational independence across the range of contingencies that Australia may face.  Future iterations of CRITICS will provide longer-term guidance as to which of these capabilities will need to be maintained in Australia, thus assisting industry’s strategic and investment decisions. 1 0 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study  CRITICS is not Defence’s industry policy.  Taken with the endorsed sector plans and the outcomes of Government’ review of industry policy, CRITICS provides the current thinking on critical capabilities required in support of the ADF, and it will continue to evolve. 1 1 Critical Defence Industry Capability Study QUESTIONS? Contact: Chris Holloway Deputy Director Capability Guidance Russell Offices (R1-3-B064) Ph. 02 6265 1198	application/vnd.ms-powerpoint	200	http://www.defence.gov.au/capability/common/docs/CDAF_CRITICS_powerpoint.pps	au,gov,defence)/capability/common/docs/cdaf_critics_powerpoint.pps	XDRZUBWBD7ENVS3ZXY2BAQPM75PBLM3O	181755	domains/defence-gov-au/powerpoints/original/au-gov-defence-capability-common-docs-cdaf-critics-powerpoint-pps-20070908132254.pps